Granberry v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Probation and Parole
This text of 61 F.3d 894 (Granberry v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Probation and Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
61 F.3d 894
Donald Granberry
v.
PA Department of Probation and Parole, Charles Witchcoff,
Agent, James Kuhn, Agent, Bill Wehrle, Agent, Fred W.
Jacobs, Chairman of PA Board of Probation and Parole, Erie
Distrct Manager of PA Education of Probation and Parole,
Dave Richardson, Erie Officer Supervisor
NO. 94-3032
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 30, 1995
Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 91-cv-00021E
REVERSED.
Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 F.3d 894, 1995 WL 406327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/granberry-v-pennsylvania-dept-of-probation-and-parole-ca3-1995.