Gramigna v. Board of Ministerial Pensions & Relief of United Presbyterian Church of North America

199 A. 177, 330 Pa. 335, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 609
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 21, 1938·No. Appeal, 210·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

This appeal raises the issue whether a principal who delivered a bond and mortgage executed in blank, together with settlement papers similarly executed, to his agent entrusted with all of the negotiations to procure a loan is bound by the delivery of the mortgage and the payment of the mortgage money to the agent, notwithstanding the agent’s misappropriation of that money. “Where one of two innocent persons must suffer loss by reason of the fraud of another, the loss must fall on him by whose act the wrongdoer has been enabled to commit the fraud”: Mielcuszny v. Rosol, 317 Pa. 91, 96. The court below correctly so held.

Decree affirmed, costs to be paid by appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gramigna v. Board of Ministerial Pensions & Relief of United Presbyterian Church of North America, 199 A. 177, 330 Pa. 335, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 609 (Pa. 1938).

199 A. 177 (Gramigna v. Board of Ministerial Pensions & Relief of United Presbyterian Church of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Just v. Sons of Italy Hall
368 A.2d 308 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Demharter v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
194 A.2d 214 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Denver v. Sharpless
159 A.2d 7 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Time Sales Finance Corp. v. Boyd
137 A.2d 864 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
Weiner v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities
51 A.2d 385 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)