Gramatan National Bank v. Meserole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gramatan National Bank v. Meserole

242 A.D. 831

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order granting summary judgment in action on a promissory note, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the court being of opinion that the undisputed facts show that section 1083-b of the Civil Practice Act is not applicable to this case as the indebtedness represented by the promissory note in suit did not originate simultaneously with the mortgage. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting summary judgment in action on a promissory note, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the court being of opinion that the undisputed facts show that section 1083-b of the Civil Practice Act is not applicable to this case as the indebtedness represented by the promissory note in suit did not originate simultaneously with the mortgage. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Davis, JJ.

Gramatan National Bank v. Meserole, 242 A.D. 831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 831 (Gramatan National Bank v. Meserole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.