Grall v. Risden

174 So. 2d 736, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3147
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 5, 1965
DocketNo. 33917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 So. 2d 736 (Grall v. Risden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grall v. Risden, 174 So. 2d 736, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3147 (Fla. 1965).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

After careful re-examination of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court so—

The petition for certiorari is denied.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLeod v. WS Merrell Co., Div. of Richardson-Merrell
174 So. 2d 736 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 So. 2d 736, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grall-v-risden-fla-1965.