Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Grall v. Risden

Grall v. Risden

174 So. 2d 736, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3147
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 5, 1965·No. No. 33917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

After careful re-examination of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court so—

The petition for certiorari is denied.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grall v. Risden, 174 So. 2d 736, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3147 (Fla. 1965).

174 So. 2d 736 (Grall v. Risden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLeod v. WS Merrell Co., Div. of Richardson-Merrell
174 So. 2d 736 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)