Grainger v. Ensley

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided August 27, 2019·No. 1:18-cv-01093·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION

JONELL GRAINGER, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF JOSHUA TODD FISCHER,

Plaintiff, No. 1:18-cv-01093-CL

v. ORDER

JOHN ENSLEY; ROBIN KATTER; DYLAN ROBERTS; CURRY COUNTY; JOHN WARD,

Defendants. _______________________________________ McSHANE, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke has filed a Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 60, concerning the County Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 52, and the State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 56. The County Defendants have filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 62, Plaintiff has filed a Response to County Defendants’ Objections, ECF No. 65, and the matter is now before this Court. The Court has reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court has given this matter de novo review and finds no error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation. State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 56, is DENIED. County Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 52, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the Findings and Recommendation. Plaintiff’s first and second claims for relief are DISMISSED. The Court shall retain supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s

remaining state law claims. It is so ORDERED and DATED this _27__ day of August, 2019.

s/Michael J. McShane MICHAEL McSHANE United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grainger v. Ensley, (D. Or. 2019).

Grainger v. Ensley (Grainger v. Ensley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related