Grainger v. Barnhart

Fourth Circuit

Grainger v. Barnhart

55 F. App'x 141

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 2003

DocketNo. 02-2255

StatusPublished

This text of 55 F. App'x 141 (Grainger v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grainger v. Barnhart, 55 F. App'x 141 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Estelle C. Grainger appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint without prejudice. We conclude, as did the district court, that Grainger failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Grainger v. Barnhart, No. CA-02-2135-S (D.Md. Oct. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Estelle C. Grainger appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint without prejudice. We conclude, as did the district court, that Grainger failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Grainger v. Barnhart, No. CA-02-2135-S (D.Md. Oct. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 F. App'x 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grainger-v-barnhart-ca4-2003.