Grahl v. Matthews
This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 135 (Grahl v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant did not permit judgment to be taken against her or refuse to plead further. The sustaining of the motion to strike a part of the amended answer, considering such motion as a demurrer, leaves the cause still pending in the trial court. The order of the trial court, considering the motion to strike the second defense from the amended answer as a demurrer and sustaining it, is not a final order from which an appeal may be taken. Holbrook, Admr., v. Connelly, 6 Ohio St., 199.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grahl-v-matthews-ohio-1961.