Grahl v. Matthews

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 135
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 19, 1961
DocketNo. 36778
StatusPublished

This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 135 (Grahl v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grahl v. Matthews, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 135 (Ohio 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant did not permit judgment to be taken against her or refuse to plead further. The sustaining of the motion to strike a part of the amended answer, considering such motion as a demurrer, leaves the cause still pending in the trial court. The order of the trial court, considering the motion to strike the second defense from the amended answer as a demurrer and sustaining it, is not a final order from which an appeal may be taken. Holbrook, Admr., v. Connelly, 6 Ohio St., 199.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grahl-v-matthews-ohio-1961.