Graham v. United States

Court of Claims

Graham v. United States

57 Ct. Cl. 515, 1922 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 329, 1922 WL 1834

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 16, 1922

DocketNo. 78-A

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 Ct. Cl. 515 (Graham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. United States, 57 Ct. Cl. 515, 1922 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 329, 1922 WL 1834 (cc 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

[516]*516MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

It appears that the plaintiff, a retired naval officer, applied to be assigned to active duty. In response to his request he was assigned to active duty to take charge of the hydrographic office at Baltimore, Md. At the time of his assignment he was in San Francisco, Calif. Before the order reached him assigning him to active duty he had telegraphed to the department: “ Will pay own travel expenses.” The order which assigned him to active duty stated. “ You are authorized to proceed at your own expense ” and that “ this employment * * * is subject to your consent.” This case is not governed by the Katzer case, 52 C. Cls. 32. The

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[516]*516MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

It appears that the plaintiff, a retired naval officer, applied to be assigned to active duty. In response to his request he was assigned to active duty to take charge of the hydrographic office at Baltimore, Md. At the time of his assignment he was in San Francisco, Calif. Before the order reached him assigning him to active duty he had telegraphed to the department: “ Will pay own travel expenses.” The order which assigned him to active duty stated. “ You are authorized to proceed at your own expense ” and that “ this employment * * * is subject to your consent.” This case is not governed by the Katzer case, 52 C. Cls. 32. The

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Ct. Cl. 515, 1922 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 329, 1922 WL 1834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-united-states-cc-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack