Graham v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Graham v. United States

218 F. App'x 240

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2007·No. Nos. 06-7677, 06-7726·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, motion for reconsideration, and motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graham v. United States, No. 5:06-hc-02076-FL (E.D.N.C. June 5, 2006; Sept. 6 & 28, 2006). We deny Graham’s motions for an injunction, to appoint counsel, and for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, motion for reconsideration, and motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graham v. United States, No. 5:06-hc-02076-FL (E.D.N.C. June 5, 2006; Sept. 6 & 28, 2006). We deny Graham’s motions for an injunction, to appoint counsel, and for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Graham v. United States, 218 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

218 F. App'x 240 (Graham v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related