Graham v. Theis

47 Ga. 479
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 47 Ga. 479 (Graham v. Theis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graham v. Theis, 47 Ga. 479 (Ga. 1873).

Opinion

McCay, Judge.

The writing and signing of a deed, and the tender of it to the grantee, is not a conveyance of the land. Until the deed is delivered the instrument is nothing, and so long as the grantee refuses to accept there can be no delivery in fact. The facts show at last only an offer to perform. The grantor [483]*483still has the title; he has done nothing by which he is hurt. He is in just as good a situation, as regards the title, as he was before he wrote the deed. No fraud has been practiced on him, by virtue of which he has put himself in a new position by parting with his title, so that to allow the statute of frauds to be pleaded he would be defrauded. The authorities establish that the part performance which entitles a contractor for the sale of lands by parol, to relief, must be a part performance of the terms of the contract. . The doing of an independent thing, even though the.act, would not have been done but for the contract, is not sufficient: Revised Code, sections 1940, 3130; Fry on Specific Per., 174; Kerr, on Fraud, 135. The basis of the whole doctrine of specific performance, by a Court of equity, of parol contracts for the sale of land, is fraud. The Court will interfere to prevent fraud, but the rule of part performance is confined to part performance of the contract. Indeed, the very word performance implies this. Any other rule would place the case altogether in the hands of one party.

If it be contended that the agreement not to bid was a part of the contract, then it is met by the objection that the agreement was illegal. It amounts to a contract to commit a fraud upon the deceased’s estate, by stifling bids at the salei This is contrary to public policy, and is only the more odious that it has the executor for one of thé parties. Altogether, we are clear that this is nothing but a plain effort to enforce a parol contract for the sale of lands, with no reason given to make it an exception to the statute.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellis v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.
229 S.E.2d 417 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Moon v. Stone Mountain Memorial Assn.
157 S.E.2d 461 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Cofer v. WOFFORD OIL CO. OF GEORGIA
69 S.E.2d 674 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Wells v. H. W. Lay Company Inc.
50 S.E.2d 755 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Smith v. Davidson
31 S.E.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Hotel Candler Incorporated v. Candler
31 S.E.2d 693 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Holbrook v. Dickson
195 Ga. 821 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Lamons v. Good Foods Inc.
24 S.E.2d 678 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Taylor v. Boles
13 S.E.2d 352 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Neely v. Sheppard
196 S.E. 452 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Winecoff v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co.
192 S.E. 29 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Gaskins v. Moore
179 S.E. 422 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Jackson
171 S.E. 171 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Giradot v. Giradot
157 S.E. 282 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Schadmann v. Durrence
141 S.E. 331 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Marshall v. Hicks
127 S.E. 273 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Kiser Co. v. Padrick
118 S.E. 791 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Render v. Harris
103 S.E. 179 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Hill v. Jones
66 S.E. 1099 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Bentley v. Smith
59 S.E. 720 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 Ga. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-theis-ga-1873.