Graham v. Tallent
This text of 224 S.E.2d 98 (Graham v. Tallent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal was transferred here by the Supreme Court. Graham v. Tallent, 235 Ga. 47 (218 SE2d 799). Enumeration of error 1, which complains that the trial court, sitting without a jury, failed to find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law as required by CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)), is [445]*445meritorious. Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471).
We remand the appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, cause appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made separately, and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal. Leasing International, Inc. v. Plemons, 136 Ga. App. 455.
Appeal remanded with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 S.E.2d 98, 137 Ga. App. 444, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-tallent-gactapp-1976.