Graham v. State
This text of 7 Blackf. 313 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Minor Graham and three other persons entered into a joint recognizance at the March term, 1841, of the Wabash Circuit Court, in the sum of 2,000 dollars. The recognizance was conditioned that one John Graham should be and appear from day to day of said term, and answer the state on an indictment against him for forgery. At a subsequent day of the term, the said John Graham and his said sureties were called and made default, the recognizance of the sureties was declared forfeited, and a scire facias ordered to be issued. In July, 1841, a scire facias in the cause was issued by the clerk, directed to the sheriff of La Porte county, requiring the said sureties to show cause why execution should not issue, &c. This writ was returned to the next term served on two of the defendants, and “ not found ” as to the two others. In February, 1842, another scire facias issued, which was directed to the sheriff of Wabash county, requiring said sureties to show cause, &c., and which was returned “not found” as to all the defendants. At the March term, 1842, the said sureties were called and made default, and an execution was ordered to be issued against them.
This judgment ordering execution is erroneous. Before an execution can be awarded against a recognizor upon [314]*314whom a scire facias has not been served, and who has not appeared, there must be two returns of “ not found ” to writs of scire facias against him, directed to the sheriff of the county wh*ch the recognizance was taken. The state has not proceeded according to this rule, in the case before us, as to two of the defendants.
— The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Blackf. 313, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-ind-1844.