Graham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Graham v. State

163 S.E. 309, 44 Ga. App. 792, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 517

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 17, 1932

Docket22063

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 309 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. State, 163 S.E. 309, 44 Ga. App. 792, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 517 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged (larceny of an automobile) was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guiltIt4follows that his conviction was unauthorized and that the court’s refusal to grant him a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, O. J.

The evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged (larceny of an automobile) was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guiltIt4follows that his conviction was unauthorized and that the court’s refusal to grant him a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 S.E. 309, 44 Ga. App. 792, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-gactapp-1932.