Graham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Graham v. State

95 S.E. 871, 22 Ga. App. 275, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 299

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 1, 1918

Docket9622

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 871 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. State, 95 S.E. 871, 22 Ga. App. 275, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 299 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The instruction complained of was not erroneous for the reasons assigned.

2. There was some evidence which authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been • approved by the trial judge, this court has no authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Eanoell, JJ., concur.

Accusation, of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Poik county—Judge John K. Davis. February 16, 1918.

Irwin & Tison, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI