Graham v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Graham v. State

166 S.E. 662, 176 Ga. 11, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 370

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 17, 1932

DocketNo. 9264

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 S.E. 662 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. State, 166 S.E. 662, 176 Ga. 11, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 370 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Erank Graham was convicted of the offense of murder, ■ and was sentenced to life imprisonment in the penitentiary. His motion for a new trial, consisting of the general grounds and one special ground, was overruled and he excepted. Held:

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. The court did not err, as contended in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, in refusing, on written request, to submit to the jury, the issue of voluntary manslaughter.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

Erank Graham was convicted of the offense of murder, ■ and was sentenced to life imprisonment in the penitentiary. His motion for a new trial, consisting of the general grounds and one special ground, was overruled and he excepted. Held:

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. The court did not err, as contended in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, in refusing, on written request, to submit to the jury, the issue of voluntary manslaughter.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.E. 662, 176 Ga. 11, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-ga-1932.

Opinion

1. The verdict is supported by evidence.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack