Graham v. State

90 S.E. 473, 146 Ga. 18, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 557
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 18, 1916·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. There being evidence to authorize such a charge, it was not erroneous to instruct the jury: “For one to kill a person who is undertaking to make upon him a legal arrest, in a lawful manner is murder, and is not manslaughter or justifiable homicide.” Brooks v. State, 114 Ga. 6 (37 S. E. 877) ; Johnson v. State, 130 Ga. 27 (60 S. E. 160).

2. Portions of the charge complained of in grounds 5 and 6 of the amended motion for new.trial were in.accord with the rulings of this court when the case was here on a former occasion. Graham v. State, 143 Ga. 440 (858. E. 328).

3. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and none of the other grounds of the motion for new trial show error requiring a reversal. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. State, 90 S.E. 473, 146 Ga. 18, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 557 (Ga. 1916).

90 S.E. 473 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mullis v. State
27 S.E.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Hilburn v. State
197 S.E. 73 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)