Graham v. State

564 So. 2d 272, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1990 WL 105500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 559 So. 2d 343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 25, 1990·No. No. 87-03082·Published

Opinion

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

The defendant, Steven Graham, appeals his convictions and sentences of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and carrying a concealed firearm. The defendant’s only meritorious point on appeal concerns costs. We agree that the trial court erred in imposing costs without affording the defendant notice or opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we strike the imposition of costs and remand to the trial court, which may reimpose costs if the appropriate notice and opportunity to be heard is afforded the defendant. The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. State, 564 So. 2d 272, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1990 WL 105500 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

564 So. 2d 272 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)