Graham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Graham v. State

788 S.W.2d 243, 302 Ark. 238, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 236

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 7, 1990

DocketRC 90-19

StatusPublished

This text of 788 S.W.2d 243 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. State, 788 S.W.2d 243, 302 Ark. 238, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 236 (Ark. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

William A. Graham, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5,1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Graham will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

William A. Graham, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5,1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Graham will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

788 S.W.2d 243, 302 Ark. 238, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-ark-1990.