Graham v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Graham v. State

90 So. 926, 18 Ala. App. 687

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 1921·No. 8 Div. 805.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There is no brief calling the court’s attention to any special ruling of the court upon which error is grounded. In the absence of such brief, we have examined each exception, and are of the opinion that the court did not commit reversible error in any of its rulings. The rulings on the admission of evidence are obviously free from error, and the question of guilt vel non was one of fact for the jury. We find no error in the record, ana the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

There is no brief calling the court’s attention to any special ruling of the court upon which error is grounded. In the absence of such brief, we have examined each exception, and are of the opinion that the court did not commit reversible error in any of its rulings. The rulings on the admission of evidence are obviously free from error, and the question of guilt vel non was one of fact for the jury. We find no error in the record, ana the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Graham v. State, 90 So. 926, 18 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

90 So. 926 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.