Graham v. Savannah Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Graham v. Savannah Electric Co.

91 S.E. 912, 19 Ga. App. 509, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 203

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 19, 1917

Docket7984

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 912 (Graham v. Savannah Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. Savannah Electric Co., 91 S.E. 912, 19 Ga. App. 509, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 203 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

The adjudication of this ease is controlled in principle by - the decision in Bird v. Savannah Electric Co., 16 Ga. App. 453 (83 S. E. 621), as the material facts in both petitións are substantially the same. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the suit. Judgment affirmed.

George and Luke, JJ., eoneur. Oliver & Oliver, L. A. Pinhussohn, for plaintiff,

cited: Turner v. City Electric Ry. Co., 134 Ga. 869; Macon Ry. Co. v. Vining, 120 Ga. 511; s. e. 123 Ga. 770; Ga. Ry. & Elec. Co. v. McAllister, 126 Ga. 447; Augusta R. Co. v. Glover, 92 Ga. 133; Wilkes v. W. & A. R. Co., 109 Ga. 794; Ga. R. Co. v. Usry, 82 Ga. 54; Pacetti v. Central Ry. Co., 6 Ga. App. 97 (1); (distinguished) Bird v. Savannah Elec. Co., 16 Ga. App. 453.

Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, for defendant,

cited: Bird v. Savannah Elec. Co., supra; Carroll v. N. O. Ry., 132 La. 683; Fuller v. Detroit Ry., 142 N. W. 572; Rose v. Boston Ry., 194 Mass. 415 (80 N. E. 580).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI