Graham v. Robbins

Fourth Circuit

Graham v. Robbins

62 F. App'x 550

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 15, 2003·No. No. 03-6035·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Graham appeals the district court’s order dismissing Graham’s amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Graham v. Robbins, No. CA-02-1619AM (E.D.Va. Dec. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [551] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Graham appeals the district court’s order dismissing Graham’s amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Graham v. Robbins, No. CA-02-1619AM (E.D.Va. Dec. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [551] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Graham v. Robbins, 62 F. App'x 550 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

62 F. App'x 550 (Graham v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related