Graham v. Robbins

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 2003
Docket03-6035
StatusUnpublished

This text of Graham v. Robbins (Graham v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graham v. Robbins, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6035

DAVID GRAHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES B. ROBBINS, Judge; PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; LOUVENIA STREET,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1619-AM)

Submitted: April 23, 2003 Decided: May 15, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Graham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David Graham appeals the district court’s order dismissing

Graham’s amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Graham v. Robbins, No. CA-02-1619-AM (E.D.

Va. Dec. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Graham v. Robbins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-robbins-ca4-2003.