Graham v. Parker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Graham v. Parker

63 A.D.3d 1064, 880 N.Y.S.2d 559

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.3d 1064 (Graham v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. Parker, 63 A.D.3d 1064, 880 N.Y.S.2d 559 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Sheryl Parker, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to determine the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL 440 in an underlying criminal action entitled People v Graham, pending the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment No. 2459/78, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 15, 2009, Justice Parker determined the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL 440 in the underlying criminal action. Therefore, the instant proceeding has been rendered academic. Rivera, J.P, Dillon, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Sheryl Parker, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to determine the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL 440 in an underlying criminal action entitled People v Graham, pending the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment No. 2459/78, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 15, 2009, Justice Parker determined the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL 440 in the underlying criminal action. Therefore, the instant proceeding has been rendered academic. Rivera, J.P, Dillon, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.3d 1064, 880 N.Y.S.2d 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-parker-nyappdiv-2009.