Graham v. O'Neal
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION EARNEST J. GRAHAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV422-159 ) OFFICER DEVIN O’NEIL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER The defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case previously moved to extend the discovery and motions deadlines because pro se plaintiff Earnest J. Graham had failed to participate. See doc. 20. Plaintiff did not respond meaningfully to that Motion, but, instead, filed a “Motion to Suppress Evidence and Statements.” See doc. 21. Not only does his response fail to address defendants’ concerns regarding his failure to participate in discovery, as defendants point out, it has no plausible relevance to this civil case. See doc. 22. It is, therefore, DISMISSED as moot. Doc. 21. Before the Court could address Graham’s inexplicable conduct, defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, doc. 23, and
moved to withdraw their request for an extension, doc. 26. Their request to withdraw the prior Motion is GRANTED. Doc. 26. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE the prior motion, doc. 20, as withdrawn. Given defendants unrebutted representations concerning Graham’s conduct, an additional comment on the pending summary judgment motion is warranted. Defendants have not sought to dismiss Graham’s Complaint based on his refusal to participate in discovery, see, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, or his general failure to prosecute it, see, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). However, this Court has the authority to prune cases from its docket where parties have failed to prosecute. See, e.g., Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962). Graham is advised that failure to respond to a motion for summary judgment is recognized as a failure to
prosecute, under Rule 41. See Wedgeworth v. Corizon Health, 2013 WL 4791619, at *1 (S.D. Ala. Sept. 6, 2013). Graham is advised that failure to properly respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment will be construed as failure to prosecute this case and may result in a recommendation of dismissal on that ground alone. SO ORDERED, this 10th day of March, 2023. Aabighon~d lies CHRISTOPHER L. RAY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graham v. O'Neal (Graham v. O'Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.