Graham v. OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC.

772 N.W.2d 46, 485 Mich. 881
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 23, 2009·No. 139567·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

772 N.W.2d 46 (2009)

Judith GRAHAM and Donald Graham, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and
Er-One, Inc., Christopher Daisy, D.O., and Michael Sims, D.O., Defendants.

Docket No. 139567. COA No. 292621.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 23, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED. The motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC., 772 N.W.2d 46, 485 Mich. 881 (Mich. 2009).

772 N.W.2d 46 (Graham v. OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Horton
772 N.W.2d 46 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)