Graham v. Norrington

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

YIE.,.ED

RONALD GRAHAM, § 3 g will ) Clerk, U,S. District & Bankruptcy Plaintiff, ) Courts forthe District cf Columt)ia ) v Civil Action No. § \”§-' \¢<@*l ROBERT N. NORRINGTON, et al. , ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINI()N

'l`his matter is before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

Plaintiff brings this action against three employees of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, apparently, in their individual capacities. While the complaint appears to allege discriminatory policies of the agency, it fails to state what actions the individual defendants have taken to cause the harm plaintiff allegedly suffers. Absent factual allegations from which the Court may make a "reasonable inference that [a] defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged," Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v.

Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556 (2007)), the complaint fails to . - ` against any of the

DATE:

nited\States District Judge