Graham v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co.
127 N.E.2d 89, 308 N.Y. 940
This text of 127 N.E.2d 89 (Graham v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Graham v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co., 127 N.E.2d 89, 308 N.Y. 940 (N.Y. 1955).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Marion K. Graham, Appellant,
v.
Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Company et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, to amend the remittitur denied, with $10 costs. [See 308 N.Y. 140.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Graham v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co.
123 N.E.2d 813 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 N.E.2d 89, 308 N.Y. 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-nassau-suffolk-lighting-co-ny-1955.