Graham v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co.
127 N.E.2d 89, 308 N.Y. 940
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Marion K. Graham, Appellant,
v.
Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Company et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, to amend the remittitur denied, with $10 costs. [See 308 N.Y. 140.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graham v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co., 127 N.E.2d 89, 308 N.Y. 940 (N.Y. 1955).
127 N.E.2d 89 (Graham v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Graham v. Nassau & Suffolk Lighting Co.
123 N.E.2d 813 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)