Graham v. M.C.C.F.

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi
DecidedSeptember 26, 2019
Docket3:19-cv-00116
StatusUnknown

This text of Graham v. M.C.C.F. (Graham v. M.C.C.F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graham v. M.C.C.F., (N.D. Miss. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION

TERRANCE GRAHAM PLAINTIFF

v. No. 3:19CV116-GHD-JMV

M.C.C.F. OFFICER MORROW OFFICER WELLLS DEFENDANTS

ORDER ADDING CAPTAIN MORROW AND OFFICER WELLS AS DEFENDANTS

Having reviewed the plaintiff’s complaint liberally under Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) – the court finds that Captain Morrow and Officer Wells should be added as defendants in this case. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to do so. SO ORDERED, this, the 26th day of September, 2019.

/s/ Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haines v. Kerner
404 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Graham v. M.C.C.F., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-mccf-msnd-2019.