Graham v. Maryland Life Insurance

102 S.E. 32, 24 Ga. App. 695, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 461
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 27, 1920
Docket10973
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 S.E. 32 (Graham v. Maryland Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graham v. Maryland Life Insurance, 102 S.E. 32, 24 Ga. App. 695, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 461 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where the insurer sues the insured upon unpaid past-due promissory notes given for the first annual premium on a policy of life-insurance, -which was delivered to and accepted by the insured, a recovery for the full amount of the notes, with interest and attorney’s fees, can not be defeated on the-ground of a failure of consideration, total or partial, in that the policy provided that it should not become of force until the first premium had actually been paid, and that a failure to pay any premium note when due would avoid the policy. 25 Cyc. 756, note 46; Id. 758, notes 62 and 63; Id. 759, note 69; Id. 760 (4), note 79.

2. The defendant’s plea of fraud in the procurement of the notes sued upon was not supported by any evidence.

3. Under the above rulings the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Darsey v. Insurance Co. of North America
123 S.E. 622 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 32, 24 Ga. App. 695, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-maryland-life-insurance-gactapp-1920.