Graham v. Macdoneld

79 F. 995, 25 C.C.A. 297, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2377
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 24, 1896
DocketNo. 513
StatusPublished

This text of 79 F. 995 (Graham v. Macdoneld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graham v. Macdoneld, 79 F. 995, 25 C.C.A. 297, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2377 (5th Cir. 1896).

Opinion

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the AVestem District of Texas.

McCORMICK, Circuit judge.

In this case a jury was waived by stipulation in writing. The record does not show that any exception was taken to [996]*996the trial judge’s rulings, in the progress of the trial, on demurrers or exceptions to the pleadings or the admission or rejection of evidence. The finding of the judge was general, and to ilie effect that the court “is of opinion that plaintiff’ has proven no cause of action.” The assignment of error is substantially that “the court-erred in rendering judgment against plaintiff.” It thus clearly appears that the record presents no matter which can be.reviewed on writ of error. City of Key West v. Baer, 13 C. C. A. 572-577, 66 Fed. 440-445, and cases there cited. The judgment of the circuit court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Key West v. Baer
66 F. 440 (Fifth Circuit, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 F. 995, 25 C.C.A. 297, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-macdoneld-ca5-1896.