Graham v. Knickerbocker Insurance

242 A.D. 890

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Judgments were in favor of the first and second mortgagees against the insurance company. The correct corporate name of the second mortgagee is “ Rosendale Developing Company, Inc.” The insurance policy carried the name “ Rosendale Development Co.” The slight discrepancy is without significance. The proof as to damages was proper under McAnarney v. Newark Fire Ins. Co. (247 N. Y. 176). There was no proof offered showing that the insured building was used as a hotel or store during the term of the policy. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. Knickerbocker Insurance, 242 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

242 A.D. 890 (Graham v. Knickerbocker Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McAnarney v. Newark Fire Insurance
159 N.E. 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)