Graham v. Knickerbocker Insurance
This text of 242 A.D. 890 (Graham v. Knickerbocker Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Judgments were in favor of the first and second mortgagees against the insurance company. The correct corporate name of the second mortgagee is “ Rosendale Developing Company, Inc.” The insurance policy carried the name “ Rosendale Development Co.” The slight discrepancy is without significance. The proof as to damages was proper under McAnarney v. Newark Fire Ins. Co. (247 N. Y. 176). There was no proof offered showing that the insured building was used as a hotel or store during the term of the policy. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-knickerbocker-insurance-nyappdiv-1934.