Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
609 So. 2d 347, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 6, 1992 WL 394847
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 La. App. LEXIS 2456 →
Opinion
WRIT DENIED.
Upon a review of the record before us, the exercise of this court’s supervisory jurisdiction is not warranted. Due to the unique nature of videotaped surveillance, this evidence is subject to discovery even though intended for impeachment purposes. Collins v. Crosby Group, Inc., 551 So.2d 42 (La.App. 1st Cir.1989), writs denied, 556 So.2d 39 (La.1990) and 556 So.2d 42 (La.1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 609 So. 2d 347, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 6, 1992 WL 394847 (La. Ct. App. 1993).
609 So. 2d 347 (Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Collins v. Crosby Group, Inc.
551 So. 2d 42 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)