Graham v. Endicott

California Supreme Court

Graham v. Endicott

7 Cal. 144

DecidedJuly 1, 1857

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Cal. 144 (Graham v. Endicott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. Endicott, 7 Cal. 144 (Cal. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Murray, C. J.,

after stating the facts, delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

The complaint was demurred to, and the demurrer properly sustained. There was no relation between the present plaintiff and Endicott that would render him officially liable. Although responsible to Adams & Co., he was, so far as the plaintiff is concerned, a mere bailee of Adams & Co., and could only be garnisheed as a private individual.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray, C. J.,

after stating the facts, delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

The complaint was demurred to, and the demurrer properly sustained. There was no relation between the present plaintiff and Endicott that would render him officially liable. Although responsible to Adams & Co., he was, so far as the plaintiff is concerned, a mere bailee of Adams & Co., and could only be garnisheed as a private individual.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Cal. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-endicott-cal-1857.