Graham v. Comm'r of Transp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Graham v. Comm'r of Transp.

152 A.3d 1245, 324 Conn. 907, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 14

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJanuary 11, 2017

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 A.3d 1245 (Graham v. Comm'r of Transp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. Comm'r of Transp., 152 A.3d 1245, 324 Conn. 907, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 14 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 168 Conn. App. 570, 148 A.3d 1147 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the waiver of sovereign immunity under General Statutes § 13a-144 extends to a claim that the state police were negligent in failing to close the bridge before a Department of Transportation crew could arrive to address the condition?

"2. Whether the Appellate Court properly imposed a duty on the state to employ 'adequate interim measures,' in place of or in addition to the defendant's duty to remedy a highway defect within a reasonable time under the circumstances after actual or constructive notice?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 168 Conn. App. 570, 148 A.3d 1147 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the waiver of sovereign immunity under General Statutes § 13a-144 extends to a claim that the state police were negligent in failing to close the bridge before a Department of Transportation crew could arrive to address the condition?

"2. Whether the Appellate Court properly imposed a duty on the state to employ 'adequate interim measures,' in place of or in addition to the defendant's duty to remedy a highway defect within a reasonable time under the circumstances after actual or constructive notice?"

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 A.3d 1245, 324 Conn. 907, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-commr-of-transp-conn-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack