Graham v. City of New York

199 A.D.2d 304, 604 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Housing Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated March 20, 1991, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Since the Public Housing Law requires that 30 days must elapse after service of a notice of claim before an action may be commenced (see, Public Housing Law § 157 [1]), the Statute of Limitations is tolled during that 30-day period (see, CPLR 204 [a]; Serravillo v New York City Tr. Auth., 51 AD2d 1027, affd 42 NY2d 918). Accordingly, the plaintiff’s action was timely commenced. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. City of New York, 199 A.D.2d 304, 604 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

199 A.D.2d 304 (Graham v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Citadel Estates, LLC v. New York City Housing Authority
39 Misc. 3d 880 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Figueroa v. New York City Housing Authority
271 A.D.2d 238 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)