Graham v. Carroll

Washington Supreme Court

Graham v. Carroll

279 P. 570, 153 Wash. 222, 1929 Wash. LEXIS 693

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 29, 1929

DocketNo. 21940. Department Two.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 P. 570 (Graham v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. Carroll, 279 P. 570, 153 Wash. 222, 1929 Wash. LEXIS 693 (Wash. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Millard, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendants, by cross-complaint, sought recovery for damages to their property by the plaintiff. From a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appealed.

The judgment appealed from was entered October 29, 1928. On January 28, ninety-one days subsequent to the entry of the judgment, the statement of facts was served and filed. For this reason, the motion of respondent that the statement of facts be stricken must be granted.

There being no statement of facts properly bringing the evidence here, and no question being presented which we can decide without the evidence, the judgment must be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Holcomb, French, Main, and Parker, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI