Graham v. Bickham

4 U.S. 149, 1 L. Ed. 778, 4 Dall. 149, 1796 U.S. LEXIS 413
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 1, 1796
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 4 U.S. 149 (Graham v. Bickham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graham v. Bickham, 4 U.S. 149, 1 L. Ed. 778, 4 Dall. 149, 1796 U.S. LEXIS 413 (1796).

Opinion

4 U.S. 149 (____)
4 Dall. 149

Graham
versus
Bickham.

Supreme Court of United States.

The case was argued by E. Tilghman and Ingersoll, for the plaintiff.

Lewis and Rawle, for the defendant.

*150 By the COURT:

The substance of the agreement between the parties was, to buy and sell stock. The penalty was merely superadded as a security for performance; and not as a sum to be paid and received absolutely in lieu of performance. The plaintiff is entitled (notwithstanding the penalty) to recover damages, commensurate with the injury suffered by a non-performance. The judgment must, therefore, be rendered in his favour, for the full amount of the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Supervisors of Jackson Co. v. Leonard
16 W. Va. 470 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1880)
Shreve v. Brereton
51 Pa. 175 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1866)
Clark v. Bush
3 Cow. 151 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)
Renner & Bussard v. Marshall
14 U.S. 215 (Supreme Court, 1816)
Pitts v. Tilden
2 Mass. 118 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1806)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 U.S. 149, 1 L. Ed. 778, 4 Dall. 149, 1796 U.S. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-bickham-scotus-1796.