Graham v. Bickham
This text of 4 U.S. 149 (Graham v. Bickham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Graham
versus
Bickham.
Supreme Court of United States.
The case was argued by E. Tilghman and Ingersoll, for the plaintiff.
Lewis and Rawle, for the defendant.
*150 By the COURT:
The substance of the agreement between the parties was, to buy and sell stock. The penalty was merely superadded as a security for performance; and not as a sum to be paid and received absolutely in lieu of performance. The plaintiff is entitled (notwithstanding the penalty) to recover damages, commensurate with the injury suffered by a non-performance. The judgment must, therefore, be rendered in his favour, for the full amount of the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 U.S. 149, 1 L. Ed. 778, 4 Dall. 149, 1796 U.S. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-bickham-scotus-1796.