Graham-Rogers v. Graham-Rogers

271 A.D.2d 821

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the matter referred to an official referee to determine the issues as to the making of the contract and the question of consideration therefor, without prejudice to an application by the defendant in the meantime to amend the judgment nunc pro tunc. (See Karlin v. Karlin, 280 N. Y. 32.) Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Callahan and Peek, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham-Rogers v. Graham-Rogers, 271 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

271 A.D.2d 821 (Graham-Rogers v. Graham-Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Karlin v. Karlin
19 N.E.2d 669 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)