Graham P. Barnhart v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden
371 F.2d 583, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7789
Opinion
This is a habeas corpus case. The facts are stated in some detail in Barn-hart v. Maxwell, 2 Ohio St.2d 308, 208 N.E.2d 752.
The district court denied the writ without a hearing, on the ground that the petitioner alleged no facts or details to indicate in what manner he contends he is restrained illegally of his liberty. In the absence of such allegations, an evi-dentiary hearing is not required. Reams v. Davis, 333 F.2d 430 (C.A. 6); Loum v. Underwood, 262 F.2d 866 (C.A. 6).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graham P. Barnhart v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden, 371 F.2d 583, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7789 (6th Cir. 1967).
371 F.2d 583 (Graham P. Barnhart v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herbert Harrison Loum v. Honorable Mell G. Underwood, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Eastern Division, Southern District of Ohio
262 F.2d 866 (Sixth Circuit, 1959)
Preston R. Reams v. David L. Davis, Warden
333 F.2d 430 (Sixth Circuit, 1964)
Barnhart v. Maxwell
208 N.E.2d 752 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1965)