Graham P. Barnhart v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden

Sixth Circuit

Graham P. Barnhart v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden

371 F.2d 583, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7789

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 12, 1967

Docket17195

StatusPublished

This text of 371 F.2d 583 (Graham P. Barnhart v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham P. Barnhart v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden, 371 F.2d 583, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7789 (6th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a habeas corpus case. The facts are stated in some detail in Barn-hart v. Maxwell, 2 Ohio St.2d 308, 208 N.E.2d 752.

The district court denied the writ without a hearing, on the ground that the petitioner alleged no facts or details to indicate in what manner he contends he is restrained illegally of his liberty. In the absence of such allegations, an evi-dentiary hearing is not required. Reams v. Davis, 333 F.2d 430 (C.A. 6); Loum v. Underwood, 262 F.2d 866 (C.A. 6).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a habeas corpus case. The facts are stated in some detail in Barn-hart v. Maxwell, 2 Ohio St.2d 308, 208 N.E.2d 752.

The district court denied the writ without a hearing, on the ground that the petitioner alleged no facts or details to indicate in what manner he contends he is restrained illegally of his liberty. In the absence of such allegations, an evi-dentiary hearing is not required. Reams v. Davis, 333 F.2d 430 (C.A. 6); Loum v. Underwood, 262 F.2d 866 (C.A. 6).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

371 F.2d 583, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-p-barnhart-v-e-l-maxwell-warden-ca6-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack