Graham, Campaign P.C. v. Fareed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Graham, Campaign P.C. v. Fareed

55 A.D.3d 405, 864 N.Y.S.2d 915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.3d 405 (Graham, Campaign P.C. v. Fareed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham, Campaign P.C. v. Fareed, 55 A.D.3d 405, 864 N.Y.S.2d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered April 13, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the first cause of action reinstated.

Plaintiffs’ allegations are not “inherently incredible” and thus do not warrant dismissal at the pleading stage. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Catterson, McGuire, Acosta and Renwick, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 30695(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered April 13, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the first cause of action reinstated.

Plaintiffs’ allegations are not “inherently incredible” and thus do not warrant dismissal at the pleading stage. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Catterson, McGuire, Acosta and Renwick, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 30695(U).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.3d 405, 864 N.Y.S.2d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-campaign-pc-v-fareed-nyappdiv-2008.