Graham Architectural Products v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance
This text of 112 F. App'x 123 (Graham Architectural Products v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
We have considered all of appellant’s arguments and, substantially for the reasons explained by the District Court in its careful and thoughtful Memorandum and Order, entered January 27, 2004, Graham Arch. Prods. Corp. v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 303 F.Supp.2d 274 (E.D.N.Y.2004), we find each to be without merit
Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 F. App'x 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-architectural-products-v-st-paul-mercury-insurance-ca2-2004.