Graham Architectural Products v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

112 F. App'x 123
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 8, 2004·No. No. 04-1002·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

We have considered all of appellant’s arguments and, substantially for the reasons explained by the District Court in its careful and thoughtful Memorandum and Order, entered January 27, 2004, Graham Arch. Prods. Corp. v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 303 F.Supp.2d 274 (E.D.N.Y.2004), we find each to be without merit

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham Architectural Products v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance, 112 F. App'x 123 (2d Cir. 2004).

112 F. App'x 123 (Graham Architectural Products v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related