Grageola-Berumen v. Holder

397 F. App'x 325
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 27, 2010·No. 07-70153·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Reyes-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and constitutional claims, Khan v. Holder, 584 F.3d 773, 776 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny the petition for review.

Reyes-Perez does not challenge the agency’s determination that he is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) based on his 1993 conviction for lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14 years of age in violation of California Penal Code § 288(a).

The agency determined that Reyes-Perez is ineligible for relief under former section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed 1996), because his ground of removability lacks a statutory counterpart in a ground of inadmissibility. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5). Reyes-Perez’s legal challenges to this determination are foreclosed by Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1207, 1208 n. 7 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grageola-Berumen v. Holder, 397 F. App'x 325 (9th Cir. 2010).

397 F. App'x 325 (Grageola-Berumen v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abebe v. Mukasey
554 F.3d 1203 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Khan v. Holder
584 F.3d 773 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)