Grafton Med. Co. v. Wilson
This text of 6 Ky. Op. 518 (Grafton Med. Co. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This was an ordinary action submitted by the parties to the court without the intervention of a jury. The judgment is entitled to the same consideration as the finding of a jury. The testimony as to the power of the agent Hazel to bind the appellant by his contracts for expenses for board, etc., is conflicting, but the judgment of the court is not palpably against the weight of the evidence. It must therefore be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ky. Op. 518, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grafton-med-co-v-wilson-kyctapp-1873.