Grafman v. Grafman

498 So. 2d 529, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2418, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10671
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grafman v. Grafman. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1010
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1986·No. No. 86-876·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in enforcing an express agreement not to seek modification unless agreed to in writing. We find no error and affirm upon the authority of Bassett v. Bassett, 464 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) and Pusey v. Pusey, 386 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

The appellee cross-appeals an order of the trial court summarily denying him attorney’s fees when he successfully prevented modification. We concur and return the matter to the trial court for consideration of the financial resources of both parties and to exercise its discretion following the consideration of same. See Turner v. Turner, 383 So.2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 392 So.2d 1381 (Fla.1980); Section 61.16 Florida Statutes (1985).

Therefore the order denying modification is affirmed; the order denying attorney’s fees is reversed and remanded for further consideration.1

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grafman v. Grafman, 498 So. 2d 529, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2418, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10671 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

498 So. 2d 529 (Grafman v. Grafman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Turner
383 So. 2d 700 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Pusey v. Pusey
386 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Bassett v. Bassett
464 So. 2d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)