Graff v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO.

106 F. Supp. 2d 997, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18358, 2000 WL 1056382
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio
DecidedJuly 21, 2000
DocketC-1-99-309
StatusPublished

This text of 106 F. Supp. 2d 997 (Graff v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graff v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO., 106 F. Supp. 2d 997, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18358, 2000 WL 1056382 (S.D. Ohio 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the joint motion of the parties (doc. 31) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), as contemplated in First National Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Hirsch, 535 F.2d 343 (6th Cir.1976), asking this Court to vacate and withdraw its Order and Judgment of April 11, 2000.

Considering the parties’ motion, their expressed desire to settle this case, the Court is of the opinion, and so FINDS, that if the case is remanded to it by the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, this Court is inclined to grant the relief requested, to wit — to vacate its Order and Judgment of April 11, 2000.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED BY THE COURT that if this case is remanded to the District Court by the Court of Appeals, this Court is DISPOSED TO GRANT the parties’ Rule 60(b) motion, to wit — to vacate the Order and Judgment of April 11, 2000.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 F. Supp. 2d 997, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18358, 2000 WL 1056382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graff-v-unum-life-insurance-co-ohsd-2000.