Graff v. Shannon

7 Iowa 508
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedApril 4, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 7 Iowa 508 (Graff v. Shannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graff v. Shannon, 7 Iowa 508 (iowa 1859).

Opinion

Wright, C. J.

When the object of a suit is to recover the possession of personal property, replevin is the action given by the Code. Chapter 115. The words “ personal [509]*509property” include money, goods, chattels, evidences of debt, and “things in action.” Chapter 3, section 26, clause 9. Without reference, therefore, to the the authorities relied upon by counsel, as to the nature of this writ at common law, we are clear that, under the Code, the instruction given was erroneous.

The suggestion of appellee’s counsel, that there was a general verdict for defendant, and that it is manifest, therefore, that the instruction, if erroneous, did not prejudice plaintiff, cannot avail. As to the other property named in the petition, the jury must have found for defendant upon other grounds, for there is no dispute but what replevin is the proper action for the recovery of most of them. So much of the case, however, as related to the notes, was in faettaken from the jury, for under the instruction given, all inquiry by them upon that subject was cut off.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harman v. Estate of Harman
167 Iowa 106 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1914)
Buck v. Beach
206 U.S. 392 (Supreme Court, 1907)
New Orleans v. Stempel
175 U.S. 309 (Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Iowa 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graff-v-shannon-iowa-1859.