Graff v. Ridley Township

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Graff v. Ridley Township

35 A.2d 753, 154 Pa. Super. 187, 1944 Pa. Super. LEXIS 352

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 16, 1943·No. Appeal, 132·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

The facts in this case are similar to those in Brunke v. Township of Ridley, 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 182, 35 A. 2d 751, decided this day, except that, in addition to the claim for consequential damages, there is a claim for a portion of appellant’s land which was actually taken in the construction of the sewer. The viewers awarded appellant $487.50 for consequential damages and $50 for the value of the property taken. Upon exceptions, the court below disallowed the consequential damages and confirmed the award for $50.

The principles discussed in the Brunke case are equally applicable here, and for the reasons there stated. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

The facts in this case are similar to those in Brunke v. Township of Ridley, 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 182, 35 A. 2d 751, decided this day, except that, in addition to the claim for consequential damages, there is a claim for a portion of appellant’s land which was actually taken in the construction of the sewer. The viewers awarded appellant $487.50 for consequential damages and $50 for the value of the property taken. Upon exceptions, the court below disallowed the consequential damages and confirmed the award for $50.

The principles discussed in the Brunke case are equally applicable here, and for the reasons there stated. The judgment is affirmed.

Graff v. Ridley Township, 35 A.2d 753, 154 Pa. Super. 187, 1944 Pa. Super. LEXIS 352 (Pa. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

35 A.2d 753 (Graff v. Ridley Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related