Graff v. Ridley Township
This text of 35 A.2d 753 (Graff v. Ridley Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The facts in this case are similar to those in Brunke v. Township of Ridley, 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 182, 35 A. 2d 751, decided this day, except that, in addition to the claim for consequential damages, there is a claim for a portion of appellant’s land which was actually taken in the construction of the sewer. The viewers awarded appellant $487.50 for consequential damages and $50 for the value of the property taken. Upon exceptions, the court below disallowed the consequential damages and confirmed the award for $50.
The principles discussed in the Brunke case are equally applicable here, and for the reasons there stated. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 A.2d 753, 154 Pa. Super. 187, 1944 Pa. Super. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graff-v-ridley-township-pasuperct-1943.