Graff v. Hipp

263 A.D. 928, 32 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7400

This text of 263 A.D. 928 (Graff v. Hipp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graff v. Hipp, 263 A.D. 928, 32 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. AH concur. (The judgment is for plaintiffs Ruth Graff and Helen MoeUer in consoHdated automobile negligence actions. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present —• Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 928, 32 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graff-v-hipp-nyappdiv-1942.