Grafa v. Schenck

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Grafa v. Schenck

162 P. 1119, 62 Okla. 272

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 30, 1917

Docket7743

StatusPublished

This text of 162 P. 1119 (Grafa v. Schenck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grafa v. Schenck, 162 P. 1119, 62 Okla. 272 (Okla. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

BLBAKMOBE, C.

On appeal to this court from a judgment of the county court of.Bryan county, a supersedeas bond was filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error. B. F. Grafa, Jessie Brannan, and B. T. Davis as principals, and the United States Guaranty and Bhdelity Company as surety, to stay said judgment. On the 24th day of October, 1916, there was judgment of this court against the appellants, and motion has been filed herein for judgment against the surety on such supersedeas bond. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, the motion is sustained.

Judgment is therefore entered in this court against the United States Guaranty & Fidelity Company in the sum of $295.82, together with interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum from the 7th day of May, 1915, the date of the judgment of the trial court, until paid, and all costs of the action.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

BLBAKMOBE, C.

On appeal to this court from a judgment of the county court of.Bryan county, a supersedeas bond was filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error. B. F. Grafa, Jessie Brannan, and B. T. Davis as principals, and the United States Guaranty and Bhdelity Company as surety, to stay said judgment. On the 24th day of October, 1916, there was judgment of this court against the appellants, and motion has been filed herein for judgment against the surety on such supersedeas bond. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, the motion is sustained.

Judgment is therefore entered in this court against the United States Guaranty & Fidelity Company in the sum of $295.82, together with interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum from the 7th day of May, 1915, the date of the judgment of the trial court, until paid, and all costs of the action.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 P. 1119, 62 Okla. 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grafa-v-schenck-okla-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack