Graf v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Graf v. State

262 A.D. 800, 29 N.Y.S.2d 136

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1941·No. Claim No. 25602·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Dowling, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts on the ground that no negligence on the part of the State is shown and that the hole in the shoulder was not the proximate cause of the accident. (Judgment for claimant for property damage to automobile arising out of the negligent maintenance of the highway.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Dowling, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts on the ground that no negligence on the part of the State is shown and that the hole in the shoulder was not the proximate cause of the accident. (Judgment for claimant for property damage to automobile arising out of the negligent maintenance of the highway.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Graf v. State, 262 A.D. 800, 29 N.Y.S.2d 136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 800 (Graf v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.