Graf v. Mazzella

240 A.D. 974
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The proceedings before the Industrial Board are a bar to this action. There was a finding therein that decedent met his death while in the employ of defendant. That no award was made to decedent’s parents, the next of kin in this action, does not change the result. (Shanahan v. Monarch Engineering Co., 219 N. Y. 469.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that on the record before us it appears that the decedent was not an employee of the defendant, and the jury by its verdict has so found, that the application for compensation was the result of an innocent mistake, and that there has been, as a matter of fact, no compensation paid to those who would otherwise be entitled to it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graf v. Mazzella, 240 A.D. 974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 974 (Graf v. Mazzella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pigott v. Field
10 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.
280 A.D. 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Meaney v. Keating
200 Misc. 308 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)