Graf v. Mazzella

240 A.D. 974
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 240 A.D. 974 (Graf v. Mazzella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graf v. Mazzella, 240 A.D. 974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The proceedings before the Industrial Board are a bar to this action. There was a finding therein that decedent met his death while in the employ of defendant. That no award was made to decedent’s parents, the next of kin in this action, does not change the result. (Shanahan v. Monarch Engineering Co., 219 N. Y. 469.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that on the record before us it appears that the decedent was not an employee of the defendant, and the jury by its verdict has so found, that the application for compensation was the result of an innocent mistake, and that there has been, as a matter of fact, no compensation paid to those who would otherwise be entitled to it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pigott v. Field
10 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.
280 A.D. 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Meaney v. Keating
200 Misc. 308 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graf-v-mazzella-nyappdiv-1933.